Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.J.B., 390 N.W.2d 274.

98 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of J.D.L. 522 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of J.D.L. 522 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
We note the supreme court’s exhortation with respect to the termination of parental rights that “untoward delay of the demonstrated inevitable is intolerable.” In re Welfare of
Spaeth v. Warren 478 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
899 , 93 L.Ed.2d 850 (1987); see Minn.Stat.
Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See also In re Welfare of (child’s best interest is primary consideration in various placement procedures, “whether temporary or permanent”).
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Welfare of -79 (Minn.1986); M.G., d at 121 .
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.H.D. 416 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-81 (Minn.1986) (interpreting Minn. Stat. § 260.221 (b)(5)).
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re Matter of the Welfare of
In Re the Welfare of M.M.D. 410 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.M.D. 410 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.A. 408 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.A. 408 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
see In re Welfare of (best interests of both child and parent must be balanced in a termination decision).
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Custody of EAQD 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simpson v. Walker 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Custody of EAQD 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(best interest of the child is primary consideration in various child placement procedures, "whether temporary or permanent"); N.M.O., d at 703 (best interest of the child is overriding consideration, even in dispute between natural *265 parent and a third person); Tubwon v. Weisberg, 394 N.W
Simpson v. Walker 405 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(best interest of the child is primary consideration in various child placement procedures, “whether temporary or permanent”); N.M.O., d at 703 (best interest of the child is overriding consideration, even in dispute between nat *265 ural parent and a third person); Tubwon v. Weisberg, 394 N.
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of A.H. 402 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ANALYSIS A natural parent is presumed to be “a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his or her child [such that] it is ordinarily in the best interest of a child to be in the custody of his or her natural parents.” -78 (Minn.1986).
In Re the Welfare of B.L.W. 395 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.L.W. 395 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re the Welfare of at 281 ; -74 (Minn.Ct.App.1986).
Tubwon v. Weisberg 394 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tubwon v. Weisberg 394 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finally, the Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized the doctrine of the best interests of the child as paramount in determining “the circumstances in which children are required to live.”
In Re the Welfare of C.D. 393 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of C.D. 393 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
As the supreme court said in In the Matter of the Welfare of J.J.B., a Minor Child, : The trauma initially attendant upon the separation of the child from his family is sometimes followed by the physical and emotional harms associated with prolonged out-of-home care.
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V. 392 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986