Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co., 387 N.W.2d 161.

86 citing documents.

Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997
Co., -66 (Minn.1986); Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd 547 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1996
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd 547 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1996
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 540 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1995
Ross v. Briggs and Morgan 540 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1995
Co., -66 (Minn.1986); Grain Dealers Mut.
Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 529 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 529 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., (single injury-causing event that did not extend over multiple policy periods).
Drake v. Ryan 514 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1994
Drake v. Ryan 514 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1994
Co., we held that an insured, who sues its primary and excess insurers for defense costs and then enters into a loan receipt agreement with its primary insurer, remains the real party in interest even though the insured was compensated under the agreement and the dispute was “primarily between the two insurers
Spicer, Watson & Carp v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 502 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Spicer, Watson & Carp v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 502 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 697 v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 495 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Mori 486 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Mori 486 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Ministers Life v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 483 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Ministers Life v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 483 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 481 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 481 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Luetmer 474 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Luetmer 474 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Grossman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 461 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Grossman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 461 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 433 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1988
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 433 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1988
Respondent points out that, in Jostens, this court did not use the “closest-to-the-risk” analysis to determine priority of coverage between an underlying carrier and an umbrella carrier.
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Campbell v. Valley State Agency 407 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Campbell v. Valley State Agency 407 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cf. Jostens, , 165 n. 1 (Minn.1986) (indicating policy limits of an umbrella policy include the amounts of underlying coverage provided by other policies).
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
CNA cites to Jostens, for the proposition that defense costs must be allocated.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by