Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, 400 N.W.2d 341.

26 citing documents.

Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 745, (extending holding of Strand to school districts that are not in cities of first class), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Moe v. Independent School District No. 696, Ely 623 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Moe v. Independent School District No. 696, Ely 623 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
No. 715, (discussing school district’s needs as a factor in a realignment context), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38 496 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38 496 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 745, -46 (Minn.App.1987) (reversal of unrequested leave placement requires reinstatement plus appropriate back pay), pet.
Jurkovich v. Independent School District No. 708 478 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Jurkovich v. Independent School District No. 708 478 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re the Proposed Placement of Hagen 465 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re the Proposed Placement of Hagen 465 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
No. 745, -46 (Minn.App.1987), pet.
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Bristol 451 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Bristol 451 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The dispute between the parties centers on whether the district is required to make a reasonable realignment of teaching positions as required under the holdings of Strand v. Special School District No. 1, and Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 450 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1990
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 450 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1990
No. 745, (extending Strand to school districts covered by Minn.Stat.
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 441 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 441 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.
In Re Independent School District No. 318 Hearing 435 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Independent School District No. 318 Hearing 435 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Strand v. Special School District No. 1, (holding that in realignment situations, “the school district’s needs reflecting the welfare of the students and public” must be considered); Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745
Heruth v. Independent School District No. 11 434 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Destache v. Independent School District No. 832 434 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Destache v. Independent School District No. 832 434 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
This court extended the duty to realign to districts covered by section 125.12 in Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.
Heruth v. Independent School District No. 11 434 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Heruth and Zauner argue that under the principles of law established in Strand v. Special School District No. 1, and Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Nelson 416 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Nelson 416 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.
Collins v. Independent School District No. 745 416 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Collins v. Independent School District No. 745 416 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The district’s schedule under the most simple Strand realignment would be: Havard 1.0 Industrial Arts Westgard .5 Physical Education .5 Social Studies Blenkush Unrequested Leave of Absence Other teacher .4 Health Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745, pet.