Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 410 N.W.2d 324.

29 citing documents.

Morex Properties, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., (citing Restatement (First) of Restitution § 76); Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk , n.6 (Minn. 1985) (citing Restatement (First) of Restitution § 85) ; Borsgard v. Elverum , (citing Restatement (First) of Restitution § 161) ; Mathiso
Adams v. DSR Sales, Inc. 727 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 2007
Adams v. DSR Sales, Inc. 727 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 2007
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc.
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Bjelland 710 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2006
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Bjelland 710 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2006
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., ).
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc.
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Eagle-Picker Indus., Inc., it is clear the legislature intended the claim to be distinct from a claim of subrogation.
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Minnesota Brewing Co. v. Egan & Sons Co. 560 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Brewing Co. v. Egan & Sons Co. 560 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., -29 (Minn. 1987).
Jackson v. Zurich American Insurance Co. 542 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1996
Jackson v. Zurich American Insurance Co. 542 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1996
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and it seems to us that when taken as a whole, one cannot read section 176.061 without concluding, as did the trial court and court of appeals, that the statutory arrangement differs from the common law and that without the employer’s consent an employee cannot settle the entire action, including the
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc.
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co. v. Eagl-Picher Indus., Inc., ).
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., two workers’ compensation insurers sought indemnity from several asbestos manufacturers pursuant to subdivision 10.
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., -28 (Minn.1987).
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., is persuasive on this issue.
Illg v. Forum Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1989
Illg v. Forum Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1989
Co. v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., we noted: “Accordingly, subdivision 10 cannot be considered as if it stood alone but must be placed in the context of the workers compensation system as a whole and, with particularity, in the context of the third party liability section of which it is a part.” Earlier in this opinion, we have held t
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Co. v. Eagle-Picker Industries, Inc., -27 (Minn.1987).