Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d 197.

96 citing documents.

Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 667 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cf. Minneapolis Star & (providing that “[t]his court has often stated that it favors the settlement of disputed claims without litigation” (citation omitted)).
Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 659 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 659 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
1 (allowing access to certain types of data in the possession of government agencies, but not providing for access to data in the possession of private parties); Minneapolis Star & -03 (Minn.1986) (stating that there is a common-law and First Amendment right to have access to civil court records); State ex rel.
Rahr Malting Co. v. County of Scott 632 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2001
Rahr Malting Co. v. County of Scott 632 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2001
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minneapolis Star & see In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings, 101 F.R.D.
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
See, e.g., Minneapolis Star & Johnson v. St.
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 552 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1996
State v. Turner 550 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1996
State v. Turner 550 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1996
rit of prohibition to issue from an appellate court, the petitioner must meet three requirements: “(1) an inferior court or tribunal must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) the exercise of such power must result in injury for which there is no adequate remedy.” Minneapolis Star & (citing Wasmund v. Nunamaker, 277 Minn. 52 , ).
Heller v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. 548 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Heller v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. 548 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
P. 24.01; Minneapolis Star &amp
T.D. v. Smith 522 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
T.D. v. Smith 522 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Flam 509 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Flam 509 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
24.01; Minneapolis Star &amp
Austin Daily Herald v. Mork 507 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Austin Daily Herald v. Mork 507 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
5 (anyone aggrieved by restrictive order in criminal ease may petition this court for review); Minneapolis Star & (“normal appellate procedure is inadequate” in cases where media access is sought and prohibition is proper remedy).
In Re Quinn 503 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Quinn 503 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
2588, 2595 , 57 L.Ed.2d 553 (1978) (plurality opinion); Minneapolis Star &amp
In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of Quinn 503 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of Quinn 503 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
2588, 2595 , 57 L.Ed.2d 553 (1978) (plurality opinion); Minneapolis Star &amp
State v. Poole 472 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Poole 472 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 128 , d at 116 (no trial judge should hear a case if a litigant has reason to believe he or she is biased); Minneapolis Star & (prohibition will lie where the trial court is about to exercise judicial power in a manner unauthorized by law).
BE & K Construction Co. v. Peterson 464 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BE & K Construction Co. v. Peterson 464 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Jerome Faribo Farms, Inc. v. County of Dodge 464 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Jerome Faribo Farms, Inc. v. County of Dodge 464 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul 449 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul 449 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minneapolis Star & Erickson, d at 886 .
Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A. 442 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A. 442 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minneapolis Star & (citing Richardson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 271, 297 Minn. 91 , ).
Husfeldt v. Willmsen 434 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Husfeldt v. Willmsen 434 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minneapolis Star & (emphasis added).
Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center Associates 421 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center Associates 421 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Minneapolis Star & the court of appeals issued a writ vacating the trial court’s orders closing a number of files from public inspection.
Parker v. O'PHELAN 414 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Parker v. O'PHELAN 414 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tierney v. American Group Benefit Services, Inc. 406 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tierney v. American Group Benefit Services, Inc. 406 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by