Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Minnetonka v. Shepherd, 420 N.W.2d 887.

63 citing documents.

Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-91 (Minn.1988) (examining both factors).
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
the supreme court explained its decision in Olson : [W]e distinguished [OZsora] from Marben on the ground that nothing was known about the informant or about what led him to believe that the driver was “possibly” drunk.
State v. Pealer 488 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Pealer 488 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In contrast, the informant identified himself so as to give the police a way to verify that he was reliable.
Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Distinguished Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(informant identified himself as station attendant at particular gas station).