Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., 420 N.W.2d 608.

93 citing documents.

R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., -14 (Minn.1988).
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co. 507 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co. 507 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(citing Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm’n on Civil Rights, ).
Harford v. University of Minnesota 494 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Harford v. University of Minnesota 494 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., (citing Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm’n on Civil Rights, ).
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., -14 (Minn.1988).
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 480 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 480 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 472 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 472 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
Collateral estoppel is “a flexible doctrine, the focus is on whether its application would work an injustice on the party against whom the estoppel is urged.” Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., -14 (Minn.1988).
Bruwelheide v. Garvey 465 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bruwelheide v. Garvey 465 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 462 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
See also Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc., and Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Saudi American Bank v. Azhari 460 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Saudi American Bank v. Azhari 460 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Houlihan v. Fimon 454 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Houlihan v. Fimon 454 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., (citing Ellis, d at 613 ).
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 453 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1990
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 453 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990
So, too, was the defendant in Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., a stranger to an arbitration between an insured and his uninsured motorist insurer.
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 444 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal 444 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Quam v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 440 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Quam v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 440 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., State, by Sundquist, v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320, Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , 83 N.W.
In Re the Welfare of D.M.D. 438 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.M.D. 438 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., ().
Clapper v. Budget Oil Co. 437 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Clapper v. Budget Oil Co. 437 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co. 437 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co. 437 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., the supreme court indicated its willingness to apply the doctrine in the appropriate fact situation, but noted it would not reach the issue there because it found that the facts of the case did not “support estoppel in any event.” Id.
Johnson v. Taylor 435 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Taylor 435 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The court in Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., discussed the rationale behind the common-law: The old non-survival rule sprang from the medieval view of torts as a form of revenge incapable of being continued on behalf of either victim or wrongdoer.
Rap v. Bjp 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
R.A.P. v. B.J.P. 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
R.A.P. v. B.J.P. 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
Rap v. Bjp 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.