Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fratzke v. State, 450 N.W.2d 101.

91 citing documents.

Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
1 (1996); (stating that an evidentiary “hearing is not required unless facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief.”).
Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
Kambon v. State 583 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1998
Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
Kambon v. State 583 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1998
An evidentiary hearing is required only if “facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief.” '
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
Boitnott v. State 582 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1998
Townsend v. State 582 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1998
Townsend v. State 582 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1998
(“[a]ppellate counsel had no duty to raise all possible issues and thereby jeopardize more meritorious ones”).
Boitnott v. State 582 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1998
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
(stating that an evidentiary hearing is not required unless the alleged facts, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief).
Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
To warrant a postconviction hearing, a petitioner must “allege facts which would affirmatively prove that his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
Black v. State 560 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1997
Black v. State 560 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1997
Berg v. State 557 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Berg v. State 557 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
Hodgson v. State 540 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1995
Hodgson v. State 540 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1995
We have held that an evidentiary hearing is “not required unless facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief.”
State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
Hanley v. State 534 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
Hanley v. State 534 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
We have held that such an evidentiary hearing “is not required unless facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief.” (citing State ex rel.
State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
102 n. 3 (Minn.1990); , 332 n. 5 (Minn.1984).
Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 251-52 , -41 (1976) (post-conviction relief allowed regarding known matter where there had been no direct appeal).
Harris v. State 470 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Harris v. State 470 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990
Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990