Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pletan v. Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38.

150 citing documents.

Davis v. Hennepin County 559 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-43 (Minn.1992); Ireland v. Crow’s Nest Yachts, Inc., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
see also Smith v. Johns-Manville Corp., 795 F.2d 301, 308 (3d Cir.1986) (warning that decision making should not be “broken down into component parts” and isolated from the context of the overall plan).
Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 553 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1996
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 552 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1996
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 552 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1996
Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 553 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1996
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
Ireland v. Crow's Nest Yachts, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ireland v. Crow's Nest Yachts, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Nisbet v. Hennepin County 548 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Nisbet v. Hennepin County 548 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Warrington v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 928 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Killen v. Independent School District No. 706 547 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Killen v. Independent School District No. 706 547 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Watson ex rel. Hanson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 540 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Watson ex rel. Hanson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 540 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In addition, discretionary immunity extends to conduct implementing a policy decision if “the consequential conduct itself involves the balancing of public policy considerations in the formulation of the policy.”
Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
3 the plaintiffs whose child was killed walking home from school alleged that the school should have been responsible for making sure that children boarded their buses.
McNamara v. McLean 531 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
McNamara v. McLean 531 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lommen v. City of East Grand Forks 522 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lommen v. City of East Grand Forks 522 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Duellman v. Erwin 522 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Duellman v. Erwin 522 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Official immunity involves discretion exercised on an “operational rather than a policymaking level, and it requires something more than the performance of ‘ministerial’ duties.”
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 518 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1994
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 518 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1994
Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carradine v. State 511 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1994
Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
Carradine v. State 511 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1994
Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
And most recently, we held that police officers who engaged in a dangerous high-speed car chase of a fleeing suspect were immune from suit under the doctrine.
Olson v. Ramsey County 509 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1993
Olson v. Ramsey County 509 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1993
Recently, we remarked that there is not always a sharp distinction between “making” and “implementing” policy, and whether consequences of policymaking might also be immune will require inquiry into “whether the consequential conduct itself involves the balancing of public policy considerations in the formulation of policy.”
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The crucial inquiry is “ ‘whether the conduct involves the balancing of public policy considerations in the formulation of policy.’ ” -44 (Minn.1992) ().
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
After identifying the precise governmental conduct that is being challenged, “[t]he critical inquiry * * 4 is whether the challenged governmental conduct involved a balancing of policy objectives.” Nusbaum, d at 722 ; (the underlying consideration is “whether the conduct involves the balancing of public policy considerations in the formulation of policy”).
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
This doctrine provides “a public official charged by law with duties which call for the exercise of his judgment or discretion is not personally liable to an individual for damages unless he is guilty of a willful or malicious wrong.” Susla v. State, 311 Minn. 166, 175
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 498 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 498 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-43 (Minn.1992) (no bright-line rule defines when vicarious official immunity extends to the governmental employer).
S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Larson v. Independent Sch.
Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1993