Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rainer, 502 N.W.2d 784.
- SHERN v. State 635 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
-
Boitnott v. State
631 N.W.2d 362
Minn. 2001
See Lahue, d at 790 (extent of investigation constitutes trial tactics); (decision not to object constitutes trial strategy).
- Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
- Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
- Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
- State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
- Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998
- Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998
- Kambon v. State 583 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1998
-
Kambon v. State
583 N.W.2d 748
Minn. 1998
“A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts which warrant a reopening of the case.”
- State v. Ronquist 578 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Ronquist
578 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Which witnesses to call at trial and what information to present to the jury are questions that lie within the proper discretion of the trial counsel.”
- Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
- Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
- King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
-
King v. State
562 N.W.2d 791
Minn. 1997
“A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts which warrant a reopening of the case.” (citing Minn.Stat.
- Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
- Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
- Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
- Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
- Dale v. State 535 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1995
- State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
- Dale v. State 535 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Kelly
535 N.W.2d 345
Minn. 1995
We have held that “[a] petitioner seeking postconvietion relief has the burden or establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts which warrant a reopening of the case.” see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
- Hanley v. State 534 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
-
Hanley v. State
534 N.W.2d 277
Minn. 1995
We have held that “[a] petitioner seeking postconvietion relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts which warrant a reopening of the case.” see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
- Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
- Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
- Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
- Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
- State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
- State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
- Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Miles v. State 512 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Miles v. State 512 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Criticized
State v. Bates
507 N.W.2d 847
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(appellate court will not review defense counsels’ trial tactics such as decisions to call certain witnesses).