Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss, 493 N.W.2d 583.

65 citing documents.

  • In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    ” Adopting “a party’s proposed findings and conclusions of law is not reversible error per se.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • Kemp v. Kemp 608 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Kemp v. Kemp 608 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    (balance between maintenance recipient’s needs and obligor’s ability to pay “can only be struck when the [recipient’s] needs are, in fact, determined”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
  • Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire Department 583 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire Department 583 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • In Re the Welfare of M.J.L. 582 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • In Re the Welfare of M.J.L. 582 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    that the district court did not adopt the county's proposed findings verbatim but rather deleted some, altered some, added its own, and, in sum, created findings of fact that were "detailed, specific and sufficient enough to enable meaningful review by this court.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (posttrial motions to permit the trial court to review, reconsider, and clarify its findings in dissolution actions are encouraged), review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    ANALYSIS I. The trial court has broad discretion in determining a support obligation; a reviewing court will affirm such a determination if it has “an acceptable and reasonable basis in fact.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    *18 -90 (Minn. App.1992) (citations omitted) (footnote omitted), pet.
  • Case v. Case 516 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Case v. Case 516 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1994