Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Knops, 536 N.W.2d 616.

132 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Melvin Shue, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Melvin Shue, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 52.01, in the light most favorable to the district court’s decision
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brenda Sue Loewen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brenda Sue Loewen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Where the findings of fact rest almost entirely on expert testimony, the [district] court’s evaluation of credibility is of particular significance.” d 616, 620 (Minn. 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Adam Christopher Robb. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Adam Christopher Robb. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The supreme court has stated that it is particularly inappropriate for an appellate court to re-weigh the evidence in commitment cases because “the findings of fact rest almost entirely on expert testimony [and] the trial court’s evaluation of credibility is of particular significance.” d 616, 620 (Minn. 1995) (citing Joelson, d at 811).
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
(“We recognize that the trier of fact is in the best position to determine credibility and weigh the evidence.”).
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that “[w]here the findings of fact rest almost entirely on expert testimony, the [district] court’s evaluation of credibility is of particular significance”); (stating it is the district court’s job to weigh experts’ opinions regarding commitme
In Re the Civil Commitment of Carroll 706 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Civil Commitment of Carroll 706 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Civil Commitment of Raboin 704 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Civil Commitment of Raboin 704 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Civil Commitment of Jackson 658 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Civil Commitment of Jackson 658 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(citations omitted) (commitment as mentally ill and dangerous); see Minn. Stat. § 253B.185, subd.
In Re of the Civil Commitment of Janckila 657 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re of the Civil Commitment of Janckila 657 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Civil Commitment of Ramey 648 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Civil Commitment of Ramey 648 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997