Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tuff v. Knitcraft Corp., 526 N.W.2d 50.

41 citing documents.

In re the Matter of the Maltreatment Appeal of Watta Yanor Kamara. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
see In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn. , (stating that appellate courts defer to commissioner’s conclusions regarding conflicts in testimony, weight of testimony, and inferences to be drawn from testimony).
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Pierce v. DIMA CORP.(1992) 721 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Pierce v. DIMA CORP.(1992) 721 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook 695 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook 695 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brown v. National American University 686 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Brown v. National American University 686 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. County of Hennepin 660 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. County of Hennepin 660 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Madsen v. Adam Corp. 647 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Madsen v. Adam Corp. 647 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 622 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 622 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP) 607 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP) 607 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Posch v. St. Otto's Home 561 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Posch v. St. Otto's Home 561 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lolling v. Midwest Patrol 545 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1996
Lolling v. Midwest Patrol 545 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1996
An appellate court reviews “the findings of the commissioner or the commissioner’s representative, not those of the referee, even though those findings might involve witness credibility.” (citing Semanko v. Department of Employment Servs., 309 Minn. 425, 428 , ).
Zahavy v. University of Minnesota 544 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Zahavy v. University of Minnesota 544 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(appellate court should review Commissioner’s decision, rather than referee’s because, on appeal, Commissioner could make new findings and decision); (when trial court may receive new evidence after reviewing referee’s report, court of appeals rev
Fujan v. RUFFRIDGE-JOHNSON EQUIPMENT 535 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Fujan v. RUFFRIDGE-JOHNSON EQUIPMENT 535 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Romanowicz v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 532 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Romanowicz v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 532 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Frandrup v. Pine Bend Warehouse 531 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Frandrup v. Pine Bend Warehouse 531 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
and Chellson v. State, Div. of Employment & Sec., 214 Minn. 332, 335
Denny v. Minneapolis American Indian Center 559 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1995
Denny v. Minneapolis American Indian Center 559 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1995
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled matter be, and the same is, remanded to the court of appeals for its consideration in light of this court’s final disposition in Tuff v. Knitcraft, Inc.