Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Robinson v. State, 567 N.W.2d 491.

83 citing documents.

Townsend v. State 723 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2006
State v. Green 719 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2006
State v. Green 719 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
4 “ ‘It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal’ from denial of postconviction relief.” ( , 494 n. 2 (Minn.1997)).
Azure v. State 700 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2005
Azure v. State 700 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2005
494 n. 2 (Minn.1997); -17 (Minn.1982).
Carney v. State 692 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2005
Carney v. State 692 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2005
But, under the second Knaffla exception, a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel known but not raised at the time of direct appeal may be brought in a postcon-viction petition if the claim cannot be “evaluated by an appellate court on direct appeal based on the briefs and trial court transcript, without any additional factfind-ing.” (“A claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel that can be decided on the basis of the trial court record must be brought on direct appeal and is pr
Torres v. State 688 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2004
Torres v. State 688 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2004
Shoen v. State 648 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 2002
Shoen v. State 648 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 2002
Townsend v. State 646 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2002
Townsend v. State 646 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2002
Robledo-Kinney v. State 637 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2002
Robledo-Kinney v. State 637 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2002
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
Explained Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111 616 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111 616 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“Findings of fact are considered clearly erroneous only if they are not reasonably supported by the evidence.” Id.; (holding reversal not warranted unless “reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made”); (“In general, a trial court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.”).
State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
494 & n. 3 (Minn. 1997); , 85 n. 1 (Minn.1997).
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
(barring ineffective assistance of trial counsel argument under Knaffla rule because it “could have been raised on direct appeal”); (noting appellant raised issue of ineffective counsel in pro se supplemental brief).
Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
State v. Gisege 582 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1998
State v. Gisege 582 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1998
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
(holding that a petitioner’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to communicate two plea offers required additional factfinding and therefore such a claim was properly raised in his petition for postconviction relief).
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997