Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of DDG, 558 N.W.2d 481.
- In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In re P.T.
657 N.W.2d 577
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“When a trial court’s findings in a termination case are challenged, appellate courts are limited to determining whether the findings address the statutory criteria, whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence, and whether they are clearly erroneous.” (citation omitted).
- In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- In Re the Welfare of A.V. 593 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
In Re the Welfare of A.V.
593 N.W.2d 720
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
ANALYSIS In termination proceedings, “appellate courts are limited to determining whether the findings address the statutory criteria, whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence, and whether they are clearly erroneous.”
- In Re the Welfare of G.A.S. 583 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
In Re the Welfare of G.A.S.
583 N.W.2d 296
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(appellate court addresses only claims presented to and decided by district court); (noting gravity of termination proceedings insufficient reason to abridge established rules of appellate argument).