Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura, 610 N.W.2d 293.

93 citing documents.

Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Associated Builders & -99 (Minn.2000).
Bukkuri v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 729 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bukkuri v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 729 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Associated Builders & Sorenson v. St.
In Re Commission Investigation of Issues Governed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 216a.036 724 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Commission Investigation of Issues Governed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 216a.036 724 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
§ 645.17(8) (2004); Associated Builders &amp
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
§ 645.49 (2004); Associated Builders & , 303 n. 23 (Minn. 2000).
State v. Lemmer 716 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lemmer 716 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
We presume that Minnesota statutes are constitutional, and “our powers to declare a [statute] unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” Associated Builders & (quotation omitted).
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Associated Builders &amp
Hassinger v. Seeley 707 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hassinger v. Seeley 707 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Associated Builders &amp
Unity Church of St. Paul v. State 694 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Unity Church of St. Paul v. State 694 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Associated Builders &amp
Ledden v. State 686 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Ledden v. State 686 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
One who challenges the constitutional validity of a statute “must meet the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.”
Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
We presume that Minnesota statutes are constitutional, and “our powers to declare a [statute] unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution.” Associated Builders & (quotation omitted).
State v. Enyeart 676 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Enyeart 676 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
§ 645.17(3) (2002); Associated Builders &amp
Pomrenke v. Commissioner of Commerce 677 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pomrenke v. Commissioner of Commerce 677 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
§ 645.17(3) (2000); Associated Builders &amp
JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 668 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 668 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Associated Builders & aff'd, Sorenson v. St.
Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Associated Builders & Metro.
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Walker v. Zuehlke 642 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Associated Builders & Metro.
Walker v. Zuehlke 642 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2002
Associated Builders & McGuire v. C & L Rest.
Roof Depot, Inc. v. Ohman 638 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Roof Depot, Inc. v. Ohman 638 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Associated Builders &amp
Defenders of Wildlife v. Ventura 632 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Defenders of Wildlife v. Ventura 632 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
There is only one recent case, where the Minnesota Supreme Court threw out legislation based solely on the “single subject” provision.
Marshall v. Inn on Madeline Island 631 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marshall v. Inn on Madeline Island 631 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Associated Builders &amp
Weber v. Hvass 626 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Weber v. Hvass 626 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
§ 645.49 (2000); Associated Builders & , 303 n. 23 (Minn.2000); (holding that statute’s heading is not part of the statute for purposes of construing it), review denied, (Minn. Sept.
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ctr., Associated Builders & aff'd

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by