Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Strommen, 648 N.W.2d 681.

398 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it is “clear” or “obvious.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Paul Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Paul Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he duty to instruct on accomplice testimony remains regardless of whether counsel for the defendant requests the instruction.”
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gentry Allan Needham Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Gentry Allan Needham Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When no objection is made to the admission of testimony, “[an appellate court’s] review is under the plain error standard.”
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(determining that testimony was highly prejudicial when it “portrayed [the appellant] as a person of bad character” and may have led the jury to punish him for other bad acts).
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it is “clear” or “obvious.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ernesto Veraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ernesto Veraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Wayne Hannine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Wayne Hannine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotation and citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Suclah Clarke Sibou Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Suclah Clarke Sibou Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A] prosecutor may not attack the character of a defendant until the defendant puts his or her character in issue.”
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it was “clear” or “obvious.” d 681, 688 (Minn. 2002) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 31.02; d 681, 686 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is “plain” if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
to support his contention.
State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph Boushee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph Boushee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is “plain” if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Ali Saleh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Amir Ali Saleh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 681, 686 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. Malcolm Roy Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Malcolm Roy Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that “the prosecutor engaged in misconduct when he .
State of Minnesota v. Adolph Donte Valentine Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Adolph Donte Valentine Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Adolph Donte Valentine Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Adolph Donte Valentine Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee Savoie, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee Savoie, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-88 (Minn. 2002); State v. Richmond, 298 Minn. 561, 562-63
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An error is plain if it was “clear” or “obvious.” (quotation omitted).