Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schiff v. Griffin, 639 N.W.2d 56.

33 citing documents.

Theresa K. Williams, Personal Representative of the Estate of Kristen Nicole Kuether, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
59 (Minn. App. 2002) (stating that standing focuses on the party and not on the issues that the party anticipates raising).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“When an ordinance is clear and unambiguous, we are not permitted to look beyond its plain meaning.”).
Plaza Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court’s decision regarding standing “must not be based on the substantive merits or prospective success of a claim.”
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that “a- determination of standing must not be based on the substantive merits or prospective success of a claim”); (stating that “[standing is a low hurdle because [one] need only al
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1003 , 1013 n.2, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998); (“The legislature may confer standing on parties who might not otherwise meet judicially imposed standards for establishing standing.”).
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Standing is an aspect of justiciability that requires a party to have a sufficient stake in a justiciable controversy to seek relief from a court.” (quotation omitted).
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“Whether a party has standing to sue is a question of law, which we review de novo.”).
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, 2005-9 v. Maria Twigg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, 2005-9 v. Maria Twigg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Standing is an aspect of justiciability that requires a party to have a sufficient stake in a justiciable controversy to seek relief from a court.” (quotation omitted).
Fosle v. Ritchie 824 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2012
Fosle v. Ritchie 824 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2012
See, (holding that the phrases “DFL” and “LABOR ENDORSED” falsely implied political party endorsement); (barring candidates for city council from using as their statement of party or political principle the phrase “DFL-Endorsed”).
Anderson v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2012
(interpreting language in city ordinance that is similar to Minn.Stat.
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rukavina v. Pawlenty 684 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
3 “Whether a party has standing to sue is a question of law, which we review de novo.”
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Nash v. Wollan 656 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nash v. Wollan 656 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2002