Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Montella v. City of Ottertail, 633 N.W.2d 86.

24 citing documents.

In re: New American Development Center Appeal of MDE-NPS January through April 2022 Claims Disallowance Decision in the … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The party seeking reversal has the burden of demonstrating error[,]” and prejudice from the error.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Cf. Montella v. City of Ottertail , (noting that legislature could have used “food” instead of “meals” to include other food service establishments in statute’s coverage); (M inn.
In re: Rental License Revocation Appeal for Stephen Frenz for properties owned by Equity Residential Holdings, LLC, National … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
6 statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful proced ure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evide nce in view of the entire record submitted.” Montella v. City of Ottertail , see also M i n n .
Tom Borchardt, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The pa rty seeking reversal has the burden of demonstrating error.”
Gregory Mailand, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The party seeking reversal has the burden of demonstrating error.” (first alteration in original) (d 86, 88 (Minn. App. 2001)).
Robert Zeman, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A city council’s decision may be modified or reversed if the city violated constitutional provisions, exceeded its statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful procedure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of 4 the entire record submitted.” (quotation omitted) .
In the Matter of the Property Located at 5420 44th Avenue S. Located in Minneapolis, MN and owned … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A city council’s decision may be modified or reversed if the city violated constitutional provisions, exceeded its statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful procedure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.”
Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach 899 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach 899 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Rental Dwelling Licenses held by Mahmood Khan Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A city council’s decision may be modified or reversed if the city violated constitutional provisions, exceeded its statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful procedur e, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.” Montella v. City of Ottertail
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator v. East Grand Forks City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator v. East Grand Forks City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court may modify or reverse a city council’s decision “if the city violated constitutional provisions, exceeded its statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful procedure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.”
Ronald "Arjo" Adams, Relators v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald "Arjo" Adams, Relators v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court’s review “is confined to the record before the city council at the time it made its decision.” (quotation omitted).
Ramsey County, Y. T. v. Guardian ad Litem, X. L., C. L., Ramsey County, M. Q. Y. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Great Western Industrial Park, LLC v. Randolph Township 853 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Great Western Industrial Park, LLC v. Randolph Township 853 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ramsey County, Y. T. v. Guardian ad Litem, X. L., C. L., Ramsey County, M. Q. Y. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Rental Dwelling License held by Khan 804 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Rental Dwelling License held by Khan 804 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
made its decision based on unlawful procedure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.” (quotation omitted).
Khan v. Minneapolis City Council 792 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Khan v. Minneapolis City Council 792 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
This court’s review “is confined to the record before the city council at the time it made its decision.” (quotation omitted).
In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class B 763 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class B 763 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A city council’s decision may be modified or reversed if the city violated constitutional provisions, exceeded its statutory authority, made its decision based on unlawful procedure, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, made an error of law, or lacked substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.” *366 (quotation omitted) (affirming city’s decision to deny the rela-tors a liquor license).