Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Heffernan, 351 N.W.2d 13.

15 citing documents.

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Selmer 749 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2008
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wentzel 711 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2006
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
(imposing indefinite suspension due to lack of prior disciplinary history and substantial restitution); Pyles, d at 326-27 (imposing indefinite suspension due to significant pro bono work and otherwise exemplary life); Bernstein, d at 805 (imposing indefinite suspension due to small amount of money taken, full restitution, contrition, and general good character); , 14-15 (Minn.1984) (imposing 3-month suspension due to extensive pro bono work, personal turmoil at the time of the misconduct, and f
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jellinger 625 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2001
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kaszynski 620 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2001
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Strom 551 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1996
See, (no disbarment where attorney’s extensive pro bono work had a detrimental effect on his financial situation); , 15 (Minn.1984) (attorney’s extensive pro bono work indicated an otherwise ethical practice and the misappropriation of client funds was an isolated incident).
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Bernard 534 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1995
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Gustafson 493 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1992
pt) disclosure of the prepaid fees, his refund of $20,000 of the fees to the estate, his age, his personal and professional reputation, and his cooperation with the director’s office, indicate that a suspension adequately discharges this court’s responsibility to “guard the administration of justice and to protect the courts, the legal profession and, above all else, the public.” , 15 (Minn.1984).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen 487 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1992
(attorney’s whole life indicated care and concern for those less privileged, extensive pro bono work performed had a deleterious effect on both his professional and family finances); , 15 (Minn.1984) (attorney performed significant pro bono work, single misappropriation of $7,000-$9,000 an isolated incident in an otherwise ethical practice); (conversion consisted of a single event, temporary misuse of $10,000 only for a short time and full restitution ma
Matter of Discipline of Simonson 420 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1988
In Re the Discipline of Isaacs 406 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1987
Although, as the referee concluded, this partner and associate misconduct is not sufficient to insulate Isaacs from his own misconduct and lack of responsibility, these problems in his professional life “appear temporary in nature and they are circumstances to be considered in imposing discipline.” , 15 (Minn.1984).
Matter of Discipline of Gubbins 380 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1986
This case, it seems to us, as it did to the referee, is not unlike
In Re Conservatorships of T.L.R. 375 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Discipline of Beal 374 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1985
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson 365 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1985
He cites Daffer, and to suggest that this court has consistently imposed some period of suspension for comparable misconduct.