Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety, 352 N.W.2d 402.

34 citing documents.

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 929 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2019
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 929 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2019
Safety , , 404 (Minn. 1984).
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, (explaining the doctrine of in pari materia); (“The doctrine of in pari materia is a tool of statutory interpretation that allows two statutes with common purposes and subject matter to be construed together to determine the meaning of ambiguous
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 683 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2004
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 683 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2004
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gilder v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gilder v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Lucas 578 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Lucas 578 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Statutes are in pari materia if they relate to the same person or thing or have a common purpose.- Apple Valley Red-E-Mix
In Re the Welfare of B.A.B. 572 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Welfare of B.A.B. 572 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Statutes “in pari materia” are those “relating to the same person or thing or *779 having a common purpose.” Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, (citing Black’s Law Dictionary (rev. 5th ed.1979)).
State v. Wetsch 511 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Wetsch 511 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“Statutes ‘in pari materia’ are those relating to the same person or thing or having a common purpose.” Apple Valley Red-E-Mix
State v. Niska 499 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Niska 499 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
“Statutes ‘in pari materia’ are those relating to the same person or thing or having a common purpose.” Apple Valley Red-E-Mix
Baker v. Baker 481 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Baker v. Baker 481 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(quoting Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, and citing Doe v. Minnesota State Bd.
Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of Minneapolis 481 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of Minneapolis 481 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, (citations omitted); accord Doe, d at 49 .
State v. McKown 475 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1991
State v. McKown 475 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1991
“Statutes ‘in pari materia’ are those relating to the same person or thing or having a common purpose.” Apple Valley Red-E-Mix
State v. McKown 461 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. McKown 461 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Bissonette 445 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Bissonette 445 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, (citing Rogers v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 218 Minn. 454, 458 , ).
Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners 435 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners 435 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
In Re the Greater Morrison Sanitary Landfill 435 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Greater Morrison Sanitary Landfill 435 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989