Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ortendahl v. Bergmann, 343 N.W.2d 309.
- Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 492 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer
492 N.W.2d 272
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ANALYSIS I. A trial court’s findings are clearly erroneous if they are “induced by an erroneous view of the law.” ().
- In Re the Marriage of Engelby v. Engelby 479 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
In Re the Marriage of Engelby v. Engelby
479 N.W.2d 424
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
A trial court’s findings are clearly erroneous if they were “induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
- Marriage of Preussner v. Timmer 414 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Preussner v. Timmer 414 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Palmer 391 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Palmer
391 N.W.2d 857
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
On appeal, the trial court’s determination of the test reliability must be upheld “unless clearly erroneous, either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evidentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
- Schuett Investment Co. v. Anderson 386 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Schuett Investment Co. v. Anderson
386 N.W.2d 249
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We will not determine that a finding is clearly erroneous absent a “clear demonstration that it is without substantial evidentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.” (citation omitted).
- Frankson v. Design Space International 380 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Frankson v. Design Space International 380 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Strand v. Nelson 380 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Strand v. Nelson 380 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Vault, Inc. v. Michael-Northwestern Partnership 372 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Vault, Inc. v. Michael-Northwestern Partnership 372 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Henley v. County of Chisago 370 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Henley v. County of Chisago 370 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public Safety 363 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Noren v. Commissioner of Public Safety
363 N.W.2d 315
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
On review, this court should uphold a finding of the trial court “unless clearly erroneous, either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evi-dentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
- Cleys v. Cleys 363 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Cleys v. Cleys
363 N.W.2d 65
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
On review by an appellate court, “a finding of the trial court is not to be disturbed unless clearly erroneous, either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evidentia-ry support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
- Smoliak v. Myhr 361 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Smoliak v. Myhr
361 N.W.2d 153
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
: [E]quity denies specific performance “where to grant it would be to compel the defendant to perform a contract which he did not intend to make or which he would not have entered into had its true effect been understood.” Id.
- Simon Home Builders, Inc. v. Pailoor 357 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Simon Home Builders, Inc. v. Pailoor 357 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Duluth 349 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Duluth 349 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Nordby v. Austin Policemen's Benefit Ass'n 347 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Nordby v. Austin Policemen's Benefit Ass'n 347 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1984