Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Caldwell v. State, 347 N.W.2d 824.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Henderson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Henderson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. George Matthews Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. George Matthews Minn. Ct. App. 2015
15, 1988); (stating that “[t]he Minnesota Supreme Court has consistently upheld convictions on the identification testimony of a single eyewitness”).
Royal Jay Toney v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Royal Jay Toney v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Meemken 597 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Cole 594 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Cole 594 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Peterson 533 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Peterson 533 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“Rulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
State v. Bashaw 531 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Bashaw 531 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ANALYSIS Generally, “[r]ulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Generally, “[rjulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
State v. Brown 455 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Brown 455 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Generally, “[r]ulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
State v. Pittman 395 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Pittman 395 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Welfare of A.B.L. 358 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Mildenstein 358 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Mildenstein 358 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-29 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (citing State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300, 313 , ), pet.
In Re Welfare of A.B.L. 358 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Givens 356 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Givens 356 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968)
State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Armstrong 352 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300, 313 , at 828 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by