Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Young v. City of Duluth, 386 N.W.2d 732.

24 citing documents.

A22-1812 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The VPA does not, however, “prevent public employers from abolishing positions in good faith.”
Tharalson v. Hennepin Parks 551 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Tharalson v. Hennepin Parks 551 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Relators argue the supreme court’s requires this court to disregard Johnson .
Taylor v. City of New London 536 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Taylor v. City of New London 536 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
the supreme court modified this court’s determination that a veteran notified of the abolishing of his position, but not of his right to petition for a hearing within 60 days, was entitled to reinstatement and backpay.
Johnson v. County of Anoka 536 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Johnson v. County of Anoka 536 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Although no Minnesota cases have faced this precise issue, the supreme court has addressed the 60-day period for requesting a hearing under section 197.46
Ochocki v. Dakota County Sheriff's Department 464 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
Ochocki v. Dakota County Sheriff's Department 464 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
The question of whether the county acted in good faith to comply with its civil service rules, -38 (Minn.1986), is not an issue in this case.
Ochocki v. Dakota County Sheriff's Department 454 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gorecki v. Ramsey County 437 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1989
Gorecki v. Ramsey County 437 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1989
Gorecki v. Ramsey County 419 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gorecki v. Ramsey County 419 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pawelk v. Camden Township 415 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pawelk v. Camden Township 415 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(a veteran need not make a request for a hearing until he has received written notice of his rights from the employer).
Young v. City of Duluth 410 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Young v. City of Duluth 410 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Myers v. City of Oakdale 409 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1987
Myers v. City of Oakdale 409 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1987
We have repeatedly held that the effect of the Veterans Preference Act is to limit the grounds upon which a public employer can remove a veteran from his or her job to “incompetency” or “misconduct.” -38 (Minn.1986).
Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 401 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Myers v. City of Oakdale 397 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 401 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1 *407 requires reinstatement.
Myers v. City of Oakdale 397 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A hearing has been denied when a position is eliminated in good faith, when a termination resulted from participation in a strike or lockout, Garavalia v. City of Stillwater, 283 Minn. 335 , and in a disciplinary suspension without pay where discharge proceedings were not pending, Wilson v. City of Minneapolis, 283 Minn. 348