Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Angelos v. Angelos, 367 N.W.2d 518.

87 citing documents.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Robin K. Magee, Housing and Redevelopment … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Anna Rae Dosso and On Behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of: Sarah Lynne Douglass v. Joshua Gary Olson, County of Clay, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of: Sarah Lynne Douglass v. Joshua Gary Olson, County of Clay, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
App. P. 103.03(g); d 518, 519-20 (Minn. 1985).
In Re the Marriage of: Beth Amy Gissibl v. Matthew Glen Gissibl Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Marriage of: Beth Amy Gissibl v. Matthew Glen Gissibl Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(addressing appealability of orders denying motions to reopen prior rulings); (same); (same).
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Blair, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-20 (Minn. 1985) (explaining that family cases are “sui generis” because, unlike most civil cases, judgments in family cases can be modified to reflect post-judgment changes in the parties’ circumstances); see also Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Ariel Theresa Bedner, n/k/a Ariel Theresa Wright, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
n.2 (Minn. 1985) (defining special proceeding as “commenced independently of a pending action by petition or motion, upon notice, in order to obtain special relief”).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Phillips v. LaPlante 823 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Phillips v. LaPlante 823 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Ihde v. Ihde 800 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Ihde v. Ihde 800 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Luke Ihde contends that, despite the first sentence of the second paragraph of rule 63.03, his motion to modify child custody should be deemed to be separate from the dissolution trial because motions to modify child custody are “special proceedings.”
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 725 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 725 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(“[Because] domestic relationships, by their nature, continue under the jurisdiction of the court virtually throughout the lives of the parties ....
Estate of Rettke v. Rettke 696 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Estate of Rettke v. Rettke 696 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Sammons v. Sammons 642 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Sammons v. Sammons 642 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Hughes v. Hughley 569 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Hughes v. Hughley 569 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(orders modifying maintenance are appealable).
Carlson v. Panuska 555 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1996
Carlson v. Panuska 555 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1996
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 533 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 533 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Nevertheless, the judgment here resulted from the grant of a motion to modify child support which is a “special proceeding.” (modification of child support is a “special proceeding”).
Marriage of Sheeran v. Sheeran 481 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Sheeran v. Sheeran 481 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(final orders denying or granting modification of custody, visitation, maintenance, or support are appealable as of right).
Marriage of Abbott v. Abbott 481 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Abbott v. Abbott 481 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
103.03(g) as an “order * * * made in an administrative or other special proceeding.” -20 (Minn.1985).
Marriage of Huso v. Huso 465 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Huso v. Huso 465 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Hofseth v. Hofseth 456 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Hofseth v. Hofseth 456 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Fink v. Shutt 445 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Fink v. Shutt 445 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 439 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 439 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Geckler v. Samuelson 438 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Geckler v. Samuelson 438 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kempf v. Kempf, 287 Minn. 529
Schiltz v. City of Duluth 435 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schiltz v. City of Duluth 435 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
The Marriage Erickson v. Erickson 430 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Marriage Erickson v. Erickson 430 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hand v. Kuutti 423 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hand v. Kuutti 423 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of McNeill v. McNeill 415 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1987