Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Coleman, 373 N.W.2d 777.
- State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
- State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
- State v. Shoop 429 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Shoop
429 N.W.2d 259
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-83 (Minn.1985); State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
- State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Parker
417 N.W.2d 643
Minn. 1988
(no objection or request for curative instruction); -83 (Minn.1985) (no objection or request for curative instruction); (no request for curative instruction); Caron, 300 Minn. at 127 , d at 200 (no objection or request for curative instruction).
- State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Roden 384 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1986
- State v. Roden 384 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1986
- State v. Roden 380 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Roden
380 N.W.2d 520
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*525 The trial court is required to instruct the jury on a lesser offense “if the offense is a lesser included offense of the crime charged, and if there is evidence which produces a rational basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting of the lesser included offense.”
- State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Stanifer
382 N.W.2d 213
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
* * * If, after comparing the elements of each offense, “a person can commit the greater offense, as legally defined, without committing the lesser offense, as legally defined, the lesser offense is not necessarily included within the greater offense.” -81 (Minn.1985) ( ).
- State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Koop 375 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Koop 375 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985