DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jackman, 396 N.W.2d 24.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
    on depraved-mind murder); (same); –18 (Minn. 1980) (same); (same); (same); (same); (same); (same), abrogated on other grounds, (same); d 315, 321–22 (Minn. 2003) (same); State v. Harris , , 850 (Minn. 2006) (same); Zumberge, d at 698 (same).
  • State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Anderson 789 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Anderson 789 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2010
    E.g., Peterson, d at 822 ; Provost, d at 104 ; -64 (Minn.1990)
  • State v. Peterson 764 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Peterson 764 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
    See, 29 (Minn.1986); *426 -32 (Minn.App.), pet.
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
    1398 , 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991) (precluding psychiatric testimony relating to premeditation and intent did not deny defendant due process); (same); -16 (Minn.1982) (finding that defendant’s right to present evidence of mental capacity only arises during the mental illness phase, and not the guilt phase); (finding that evidence of mental capacity
  • State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
    (holding that circumstances surrounding a shooting supported jury’s determination that defendant was not legally insane); DeMars, d at 16 (holding that defendant’s calmness several hours after he killed his mother and attempts to cover up his actions were sufficient to support determination th
  • State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Sanford v. State 499 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Sanford v. State 499 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
    The third-degree murder statute “was intended to cover reckless or wanton acts committed without regard to their effect on particular persons.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
    -17 (Minn.1982) (psychiatric testimony confined to mental illness phase of trial and not admissible with respect to determining premeditation); (affirming rejection of psychiatric testimony on the issue of premeditation).
  • State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    (applying Minn.R.Crim.P.
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
    Similarly, we held the evidence was sufficient to support the jury determination the defendant’s actions in shooting an employee of a bar were premeditated and intentional where the defendant threatened the employee, then left the bar before returning with a shotgun and shooting the employee while moving toward him