Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thorn v. Glass Depot, 373 N.W.2d 799.
- ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- McClintock v. Roger's Cablesystems of Minneapolis Ltd. Partnership 478 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
McClintock v. Roger's Cablesystems of Minneapolis Ltd. Partnership
478 N.W.2d 781
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ponticas, d at 915 ; pet.
- Myers v. Winslow R. Chamberlain Co. 443 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Anderson v. Lloyd's Feed Service 443 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Myers v. Winslow R. Chamberlain Co.
443 N.W.2d 211
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict shall not be granted if there is “ ‘ANY competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict.’ ” Johnson v. Alford & Neville, Inc., ( pet for rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
-
Anderson v. Lloyd's Feed Service
443 N.W.2d 208
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
A motion for JNOV will not be granted as long as there is “ANY competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict.” pet.
- Gray v. Davis 414 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Gray v. Davis 414 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Frank v. Frank 409 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Frank v. Frank 409 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Jonathan v. Kvaal 403 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Gross on Behalf of Gross v. Running 403 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Gross on Behalf of Gross v. Running
403 N.W.2d 243
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citations omitted), pet.
- Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Johnson v. Alford & Neville, Inc. 397 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Johnson v. Alford & Neville, Inc.
397 N.W.2d 591
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
DISCUSSION I A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict will not be granted as long as there is “ANY competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict.” pet.
- Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Black v. Stumvoll 374 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Black v. Stumvoll 374 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1985