Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Norris, 428 N.W.2d 61.
- State v. Pelawa 590 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
- State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
- State v. Lundberg 575 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Lundberg 575 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Hough
571 N.W.2d 578
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(modifying consecutive sentences that, although technically permissible, exaggerated criminality of defendant’s conduct).
- State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
- State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
- State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
- State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
- State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Branson 529 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Branson 529 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Sims 526 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1994
-
State v. Sims
526 N.W.2d 201
Minn. 1994
(theft by swindle is a crime of dishonesty or false statement) (theft by shoplifting is not a crime of dishonesty or false statement).
- State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Halvorson
506 N.W.2d 331
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Swanson, d at 440 (reviewing court must determine whether consecutive sentences are commensurate with culpability and not exaggeration of criminality); (when consecutive sentences are permissive, court may impose them as long as they do not unfairly exaggerate criminality of conduct).
- State v. Gassler 505 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Gassler
505 N.W.2d 62
Minn. 1993
cited by appellant, the defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and of five counts of assault in the second degree involving five separate victims.
- State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
- State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
- State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
- State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
- State v. Ross 491 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Ross
491 N.W.2d 658
Minn. 1992
(holding that theft by shoplifting is not a crime directly involving “dishonesty or false statement"), (holding that a conviction of theft by swindle is a crime directly involving "dishonesty or false statement").
- State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
- State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
- State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
- State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
- State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
- State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Moore
458 N.W.2d 90
Minn. 1990
and State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300, 306
- State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Drieman
457 N.W.2d 703
Minn. 1990
(8-year-old offense admissible where defendant incarcerated for 6 years); (9-year-old offense admissible where defendant incarcerated for most of time).
- State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990