DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Glaraton, 425 N.W.2d 831.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    8, 1988); -35 (Minn. 1988).
  • Minn. 2020
    ildren, inflicted “gratuitous acts of violence” on her, and knew that he had AIDS when he committed the offense); Rairdon, d at 327 (finding severe aggravating circumstances in case involving interfamilial sexual abuse with multiple forms of penetration, victim vulnerability, particular cruelty, and habitual sexual abuse that began when the victim was 8 years old); d 831, 834 (Minn. 1988) (affirming a greater-than-double durational departure for first- degree criminal sexual conduct when the def
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    In State v. Glaraton, the supreme court found severe and aggravating circumstances were present when the defendant “stuck the gun in the victim’s mouth and in his rectum, causing the victim to think he was going to die a horrible death.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    See, 692 (Minn. 1997) (affirming a greater than triple departure when defendant threatened to kill the victim and her children, choked the victim to the point of losing consciousness, and committed the sexual assault knowing he had AIDS); State v. 16 Glaraton, (affirming a greater than triple departure when defendant stuck a gun in the victim’s mouth and rectum, “inflicted gratuitous physical injury,” urinated on the victim’s face and forced the victim to lie in the urine, and ridiculed the vict
  • Ahmed Shire Ali v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Ahmed Shire Ali v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    26, 1989); –35 (Minn. 1988) (reinstating sentence of greater-than-quadruple upward departure based on numerous aggravating factors, including “the infliction of psychological trauma” to victim); (determining that victim’s need for “future counseling for her psychol
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
  • Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Sanchez-Sanchez 654 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Sanchez-Sanchez 654 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    “Generally, when aggravating circumstances are present, the upper limit on a durational departure is double the Sentencing Guidelines maximum presumptive sentence duration.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Williams 608 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Williams 608 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
    *692 This court has held that when “severe aggravating circumstances” exist, “the only absolute limit on sentence duration for the offense is that provided by the legislature in the statutory definition of the offense.” ( , 94 n. 1 (Minn.1987)).
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Branson 529 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Branson 529 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Kimmons 502 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Kimmons 502 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Yanez 469 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Yanez 469 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    the supreme court stated: Generally, when aggravating circumstances are present, the upper limit on a *456 durational departure is double the Sentencing Guidelines maximum presumptive sentence duration.
  • State v. Hayes 456 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Hayes 456 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989