Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sorenson, 441 N.W.2d 455.

166 citing documents.

State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
We have said that "[w]e do not 'decide issues which are not first addressed by the trial court and are raised for the first time on appeal even if the issues involve constitutional questions regarding criminal procedure.’ " ().
State v. Scott 501 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
State v. Scott 501 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
this court said: “We may, however, at our discretion, decide to hear such issues when the interests of justice require their consideration and addressing them would not work an unfair surprise on a party.” Id.
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 492 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 492 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Branson 487 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1992
State v. Branson 487 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1992
State v. Thompson 486 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Thompson 486 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Roby 463 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1990
State v. Roby 463 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1990
1 We do not “decide issues which are not first addressed by the trial court and are raised for the first time on appeal even if the issues involve constitutional questions regarding criminal procedure.”
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Lozar 458 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Lozar 458 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1990