Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wold v. State, 430 N.W.2d 171.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
3; (explaining that while mental illness may overlap with incompetence , mental illness does not “automatically mandate a finding of incompetence”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The supreme court has “recognized that in order to freeze the situation, the stop of a person present at the scene of a recently committed crime of violence may be permiss ible without trampling on the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure.” Wold v. State , ( citations omitted) .
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Constitutional prohibitions on unreasonable searches and seizures are designed “to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals.” (quoting United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 554, 96 S. Ct. 3074, 3081 (1976)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
see also Appelgate v. Comm’r of Pub.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Wold v. Stat e, d 171, 174 (Minn. 1988).
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Frederick Smart Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Frederick Smart Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
5 persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.” “Generally, a search or seizure of an individual is not constitutionally permissible unless the officers making the search have an arrest warrant, search warrant or have probable cause to make an arrest.”
- State v. Varnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
- State v. Yarnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Varnado
582 N.W.2d 886
Minn. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
-
State v. Yarnado
582 N.W.2d 886
Minn. 1998
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
- State v. Harris 572 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Harris 572 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
- State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
- State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Crook 485 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Crook 485 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Eggersgluess 483 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
State v. Eggersgluess
483 N.W.2d 94
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
- State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. White 468 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Capers 451 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Capers
451 N.W.2d 367
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The supreme court discussed the appropriate level of review for the constitutionality of a -74 (1988).
- State v. Moffatt 450 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Moffatt
450 N.W.2d 116
Minn. 1990
-76 (Minn.1988), -14 (Minn.1987) (cases suggesting that when police stop people suspected' of burglary and other serious crime such as robbery or assault they usually have a right to frisk for weapons).