Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp., 450 N.W.2d 913.

90 citing documents.

Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
accountant from the duty to refrain from knowingly being party to fraud.”); see also Hydra-Mac, (in dispute involving contract to purchase, it would be a “distortion of law” if a cause of action for fraud could not be asserted despite fact that contract validly disclaimed ab warranties), aff'd in part and rev’d in *185 part on other grounds, St.
Roof Depot, Inc. v. Ohman 638 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Roof Depot, Inc. v. Ohman 638 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Hydra-Mac, (interpreting contractual language in its context).
Cattnach v. State Farm Insurance Co. 577 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cattnach v. State Farm Insurance Co. 577 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The Catt-nachs cite Hydra-Mac, which states that one party’s fraudulent concealment of facts tolls the statute of limitations until the other party discovers the concealed facts.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
See Hydra-Mac, (allowing the plaintiff — a marketer of skid loaders and subpurehaser of defective engines — to recover for lost profits and unreimbursed repair and retrofit expenses, and noting that the district court properly applied section 336.2-318); see also Transport Corp. of Am.
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In addition, we must give the language of the lease its plain meaning and interpret it “in the context of the entire agreement.” Hydra-Mac
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 544 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 544 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Smith Harvestore Prods., (quoting Hydra-Mac, ).
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. 536 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. 536 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hydra-Mac, -17 (Minn.1990).
Home Lumber Co. v. Kopfmann Homes, Inc. 535 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1995
Home Lumber Co. v. Kopfmann Homes, Inc. 535 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1995
The “[construction and effect of a contract presents a question of law, unless an ambiguity exists.” (citing Hydra-Mac, -17 (Minn.1990)).
Central Distribution Carriers, Inc. v. Mrs. Gerry's Kitchen, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Central Distribution Carriers, Inc. v. Mrs. Gerry's Kitchen, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hydra-Mac, (citing Northern Petrochemical Co., d at 410 ).
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1994
Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1994
Fraudulent concealment “tolls the statute of limitations until the party discovers, or has a reasonable opportunity to discover, the concealed defect.” Hydra-Mac
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 518 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 518 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Hydra-Mac, (once a reasonable inference regarding damages is raised, defendant is liable unless the inference is rebutted).
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1991
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1991
This court explained in Hydra-Mac, that “[a] party need not know the details of the evidence establishing the cause of action, only that the cause of action exists.” Id.
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See, e.g., Hydra-Mac, (breach of warranty), affd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, -17 (Minn.1990).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by