DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Slowinski, 450 N.W.2d 107.

113 citing documents.

  • State v. Frisinger 478 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    The trial court has discretion to admit such evidence, however, to show “motive, intent, absence of mistake or accident, identity or common scheme or plan.” (citing State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491 , ).
  • State v. Robinson 476 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Robinson 476 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Blair 474 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Blair 474 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    (citing Spreigl, 272 Minn. at 491 , d at 169 ).
  • State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
  • McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
    for example, the court concluded that a defendant’s confession was voluntary in part because police had neither made false promises of leniency nor misstated the law in attempting to secure the confession.
  • State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
  • State v. DeWald 464 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1991
    Such evidence may be admitted, however, “to establish motive, intent, absence of mistake or accident, identity or *503 common scheme or plan.” (citing State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491 , ).