Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben, 505 N.W.2d 323.

78 citing documents.

Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
28, 1996); see also Bob Useldinger & Sons, (declining to apply the doctrine despite claims that a party had asked for and been assured coverage, because “the purchasers of the insurance were experienced business people, and there is nothing in the language of the policies that would raise a reasonable expectation of coverage”); Austin P. Kelle
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. 666 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2003
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. 666 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2003
v. Lor, (citing Bob *324 Useldinger & Sons, ).
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
Bob Useldinger & Sons
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bob Useldinger & Sons
Rinn v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society 611 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rinn v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society 611 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc., v. Hangsleben, (affirming grant of summary judgment where nonmoving party engages in mere speculation and conjecture); Messner , 238 Minn, at 413-15, d at 661-62 (grant of judgment notwithstanding verdict proper where there was no direct evidence as to how a banana peel came to be on the floor, or how long i
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Lor 591 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1999
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Lor 591 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1999
Bob Useldinger & Sons
Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. 586 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. 586 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bob Useldinger & Sons
Benilde-St. Margaret's High School v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bob Useldinger & Sons
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See.Bob Useldinger & Sons, (concluding no fact issue precluding summary judgment where evidence presented by non-moving party more speculative than probative); Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Fed.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Henry Campbell Black, et al., Black's Law Dictionary 525 (6th ed.1990) (defining employee as person in service of another under any contract for hire, express or implied, oral or written, where employer has power or right to control and direct employee in material details of how work is to be performed); see also Bob Useldinger & Sons, -29 (Minn. 1993) (holding unambiguous language in insurance policy must be given its plain and ordinary meaning).
Ai Viet Thi Nguyen v. Phu Chau Nguyen 565 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ai Viet Thi Nguyen v. Phu Chau Nguyen 565 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
“Mere speculation, without some concrete evidence, is not enough to avoid summary judgment.” Bob Useldinger & Sons, see Elias v. City of St.
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 566 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1997
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 566 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
See Bob Useldinger & Sons
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
See Bob Useldinger & Sons, Moundsview Indep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by