Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dietz v. Dodge County, 487 N.W.2d 237.

213 citing documents.

Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(APA applies only to entities having statewide jurisdiction).
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231, 245-46 , (absent method of review or legal remedy, judicial review of “quasi-judicial decisions of administrative bodies, if available, must be invoked by writ of certiorari”).
Chronopoulos v. University of Minnesota 520 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Chronopoulos v. University of Minnesota 520 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 520 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
in which the supreme court stated that judicial review of an agency’s quasi-judicial decision must be by writ of certiorari “in the absence of an adequate method of review or legal remedy.” In this case, were this court’s review foreclosed, Meath would not be entitled to any review of the board’s deni
Township of Honner v. Redwood County 518 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Township of Honner v. Redwood County 518 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ganguli v. University of Minnesota 512 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ganguli v. University of Minnesota 512 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Stadum v. Norman County 508 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Stadum v. Norman County 508 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In dismissing appellant’s wrongful discharge claims, the trial court relied on two cases: and Dokmo v. Independent Sch.