Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Maidi, 537 N.W.2d 280.

58 citing documents.

State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
We have recognized that restitution is “primarily intended to compensate victims.” (citing to legislative history).
State v. Tenerelli 583 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Tenerelli 583 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Restitution is primarily intended to compensate a crime victim for his or her loss by restoring the victim to their original financial condition.” (providing that “restitution statute was primarily intended to compensate victims”).
State v. Terpstra 546 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1996
State v. Terpstra 546 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1996