Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, 535 N.W.2d 612.

39 citing documents.

Cyrenus Rubald v. Rubald Properties, LLC, Quintin Rubald, III, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
David Levy v. Daily Dental Care, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
Anthony Novak v. Lorie Miller, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
William M. Ross v. Dianne’s Custom Candles, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touc he, (explaining that the question was “whether the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law” that the investor’s claims “are nonderivative”).
Kathryn Ward Blum, et al., Thomas Ward v. Molly Thompson, et al., Ward Family, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Racquet Swim & Health Club s, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (explaining that the question was “whether the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law” that the investor’s claims “are nonderivative”).
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
As a general rule, “an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to the corporation.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
Greenpond South, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp. 886 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greenpond South, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp. 886 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (noting, in its determination that débtholder’s fraud claims were direct, rather than derivative of bank’s claims, that “Minnesota has long adhered to the general principle that an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to.
Linda “Randee” Wines v. Jeff Wines, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Linda “Randee” Wines v. Jeff Wines, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, -18 (Minn. 1995) (citing Seitz v. Michel, 148 Minn. 474, 475, ).
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
As a general rule, “an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to the corporation.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
see also Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
-40 (Minn.1996); accord Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 682 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2004
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 682 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2004
-40 (Minn.1996); Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
Stocke v. Berryman 632 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Stocke v. Berryman 632 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 592 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1999
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 592 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1999
When a shareholder asserts a cause of action belonging to the corporation, the shareholder must seek redress in a “ ‘derivative’ action on behalf of the corporation rather than in a direct action by the individual shareholder.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (citation omitted).
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, for example, the Minnesota Supreme Court noted that, in distinguishing between direct and derivative claims, courts must “consider whether the injury to the individual plaintiff is separate and distinct from the injury to other persons in a similar situation as the plaintiff.” (“Northwest ”) (citing Seitz v. Michel, 148 Minn. 474, 476 , 181 N.W.
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
P. 117; -40 (Minn.1996); Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. De-loitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990); Hon.
Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
See Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Skoglund v. Brady 541 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Skoglund v. Brady 541 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Arent v. Distribution Sciences, Inc., 975 F.2d 1370, 1372 (8th Cir.1992)(cited in Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 617-18 n. 5 (Minn.1995)).