DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, 535 N.W.2d 612.

39 citing documents.

  • Cyrenus Rubald, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • David Levy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • Anthony Novak, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • William M. Ross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touc he, (explaining that the question was “whether the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law” that the investor’s claims “are nonderivative”).
  • Kathryn Ward Blum, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Racquet Swim & Health Club s, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
  • In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (explaining that the question was “whether the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law” that the investor’s claims “are nonderivative”).
  • Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    As a general rule, “an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to the corporation.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • Greenpond South, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp. 886 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Greenpond South, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp. 886 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (noting, in its determination that débtholder’s fraud claims were direct, rather than derivative of bank’s claims, that “Minnesota has long adhered to the general principle that an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to.
  • Linda �RandeeŽ Wines v. Jeff Wines Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Linda �RandeeŽ Wines v. Jeff Wines Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
  • In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Distinguished In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, -18 (Minn. 1995) (citing Seitz v. Michel, 148 Minn. 474, 475, ).
  • Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
  • Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
  • Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
  • Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
    Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
  • Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    As a general rule, “an individual shareholder may not assert a cause of action that belongs to the corporation.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
  • George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
    see also Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
  • In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
  • In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
    -40 (Minn.1996); accord Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
  • Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 682 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2004
  • Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 682 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2004
    -40 (Minn.1996); Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995).
  • Stocke v. Berryman 632 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Stocke v. Berryman 632 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche
  • Wessin v. Archives Corp. 592 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1999
  • Wessin v. Archives Corp. 592 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1999
    When a shareholder asserts a cause of action belonging to the corporation, the shareholder must seek redress in a “ ‘derivative’ action on behalf of the corporation rather than in a direct action by the individual shareholder.” Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, (citation omitted).
  • Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    In Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, for example, the Minnesota Supreme Court noted that, in distinguishing between direct and derivative claims, courts must “consider whether the injury to the individual plaintiff is separate and distinct from the injury to other persons in a similar situation as the plaintiff.” (“Northwest ”) (citing Seitz v. Michel, 148 Minn. 474, 476 , 181 N.W.
  • Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
  • Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
    P. 117; -40 (Minn.1996); Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. De-loitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990); Hon.
  • Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
  • Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
    See Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
  • Skoglund v. Brady 541 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Skoglund v. Brady 541 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Arent v. Distribution Sciences, Inc., 975 F.2d 1370, 1372 (8th Cir.1992)(cited in Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 617-18 n. 5 (Minn.1995)).