Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bol v. Cole, 561 N.W.2d 143.

67 citing documents.

Simpson v. American Family Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Loftus v. Hennepin County 591 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Loftus v. Hennepin County 591 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Questions of law, including the interpretation of statutes, are subject to de novo review.”
Marriage of Klingenschmitt v. Klingenschmitt 580 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Klingenschmitt v. Klingenschmitt 580 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchanan v. Minnesota State Department of Health 573 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchanan v. Minnesota State Department of Health 573 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(holding “the public interest served must be one of paramount importance”).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp. 571 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp. 571 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1997
Redwood County Telephone Co. v. Luttman 567 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redwood County Telephone Co. v. Luttman 567 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997