DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M., 560 N.W.2d 687.

215 citing documents.

  • In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    A juvenile’s confession is regarded as voluntary,, “if the totality of the circumstances show that the statement was the product of a free-will decision.” Welfare of G.M., (citations omitted).
  • State v. Cook 610 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Cook 610 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Demry 605 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Demry 605 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    ANALYSIS This court reviews de novo the trial court’s “determination of reasonable suspicion as it relates to Terry stops and probable cause as it relates to warrantless searches.”
  • State v. Richmond 602 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Richmond 602 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    In re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
    “When reviewing the legality of a search and seizure, an appellate court will not reverse the trial court’s findings unless clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”
  • State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 698-99 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ingram 570 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Ingram 570 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    The officer’s determination is made “in light of his or her experience that criminal activity may be afoot.”
  • State v. Carter 569 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Carter 569 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1997
    Id.; In re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.