Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Folkers, 581 N.W.2d 321.

37 citing documents.

Brian Ford Dowell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We do not retry the facts, because the fact - finder assesses the credibility of witnesses and weighs their testimony
State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy Hicks 864 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy Hicks 864 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2015
-39, 744 (Minn.1998); 327 (Minn.1998); -55 (Minn.1982).
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (holding that defendant’s “entire lack of remorse” was a sufficient reason to grant upward durational departure); -93 (Minn. App. 1996) (holding that “overwhelming evidence” of defendant’s lack of remorse “was properly considered as an aggravating factor justif
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A finding that the victim was treated with particular cruelty alone [is] enough to justify the departure because that factor is specifically included as an aggravating factor justifying an upward departure in the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines.”
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, -68 (Minn.App.1987), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Green 719 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2006
State v. Green 719 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2006
State v. Mitchell 687 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Mitchell 687 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In re the Welfare of A.A.M. 684 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Aam 684 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In re the Welfare of A.A.M. 684 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Aam 684 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Leja 684 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 2004
State v. Leja 684 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 2004
Folkers, Griller, d at 744 n. 9.
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Pippitt 645 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 2002
State v. Pippitt 645 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 2002
(rejecting defendant’s argument that impeachment rendered witness’s testimony unworthy of belief as a matter of law); State v. Stevens, 248 Minn. 309, 313 , (stating that even if jurors believe that a witness knowingly and willfully testified falsely to a material fact, they ma
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
State v. Pinkerton 628 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Pinkerton 628 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Peralta 598 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Peralta 598 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(stating rule 15.06 is “virtually identical” to Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
29 .See Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.D.2.b (aggravating factors); (concealment of body, remorse, and attempt to shift blame); Rairdon, d at 327 (particular cruelty); (concealment of body).