Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Loge, 608 N.W.2d 152.
- State v. Asfeld 662 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Asfeld
662 N.W.2d 534
Minn. 2003
In statutory interpretation, “where the language of the statute is clear, the court is bound to give effect thereto.” -57 (Minn.2000).
- Janssen v. Best & Flanagan 662 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2003
- Janssen v. Best & Flanagan 662 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2003
- State v. Arkell 657 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
State v. Arkell
657 N.W.2d 883
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding that statute silent on mens rea does not require that state prove culpable intent to impose misdemeanor liability on driver of motor vehicle containing open bottle of intoxicating liquor).
- Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips 625 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2001
-
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips
625 N.W.2d 813
Minn. 2001
Statutory construction “must begin with a careful and close examination of the statutory language.”
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001
- Mullins v. Churchill 616 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Mullins v. Churchill 616 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- In Re Welfare of C.R.M. 611 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2000
- In Re Welfare of C.R.M. 611 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2000