Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 332 N.W.2d 160.

26 citing documents.

Rebecca A. Niebuhr v. Jacob Sieberg, Timothy Sieberg Minn. 2026
Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Depositors Ins. Co. v. Dollansky 919 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2018
Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 658 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2003
Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 658 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2003
(noting that the policy behind Minn.Stat.
Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 643 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 643 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (quotation omitted).
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., Shuck v. Means, 302 Minn. 93, 96
Johnson v. Johnson 611 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. Johnson 611 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bates v. Armstrong 603 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bates v. Armstrong 603 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., (citation omitted).
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Raincloud 563 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Raincloud 563 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 519 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 519 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guar.
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
McClain v. Begley 465 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1991
Whaley v. Anderson 458 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Whaley v. Anderson 458 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Whaley argues public policy requires that persons injured as a result of the negligent operation of motor vehicles be given “an approximate certainty of effective recovery by making the owner who lent his vehicle to another responsible.” (citing Hutchings v. Bourdages, 291 Minn. 211 , ).
Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz 385 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz 385 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In a memorandum accompanying the order for summary judgment, : There was no initial permission granted by David Diaz to Joseph Diaz to operate the former’s vehicle.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court adopted the initial permission rule holding: [W]hen permission to use a vehicle is initially given, subsequent use short of actual conversion or theft remains permissive within the meaning of the omnibus clause, even if such use was not within the contemplation of the parties or