Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Taylor v. Taylor, 329 N.W.2d 795.

131 citing documents.

Marriage of Christensen v. Christensen 393 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Christensen v. Christensen 393 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 393 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The panel issued an order in July 1983 finding that an accurate valuation of the pension benefits was not possible at the present time and that the “reserved jurisdiction method” as described *34 should have been utilized.
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-99 (Minn.1983); (where information is available to this court, we may make the findings of pension valuation without remanding for further proceedings).
Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently outlined two methods for dividing vested *336 stating: In deciding whether retirement benefits should be divided at the time of dissolution or upon future receipt by the employee spouse, the trial court should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each method in light of the facts of the particular case before it.
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pekarek v. Pekarek 384 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pekarek v. Pekarek 384 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-99 (Minn.1983) (deferred jurisdiction method of splitting the assets of a pension fund should be utilized where the parties have few cash assets).
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court said regarding the division of pension benefits: The valuation and division of pension rights is generally a matter for the trial court’s discretion.
Marriage of Margeson v. Margeson 376 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Margeson v. Margeson 376 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 372 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 372 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The parties stipulated that the marital interest in Carl’s with payment deferred until receipt of the pension benefits.
Redding v. Redding 372 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Redding v. Redding 372 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Esposito v. Esposito 371 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Esposito v. Esposito 371 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 426
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
: Division of retirement benefits at the time of divorce has the obvious advantage of avoiding the continuing jurisdiction of the court in order to insure that the appropriate payments are made to the non-employee spouse upon receipt of pension benefits by the employee spouse.
Marriage of Rohling v. Rohling 363 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rohling v. Rohling 363 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 364 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 364 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of McGowan v. McGowan 363 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985