Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Evans v. Blesi, 345 N.W.2d 775.

84 citing documents.

Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See also Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 123
Bosshart v. Commissioner of Public Safety 427 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bosshart v. Commissioner of Public Safety 427 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rigwald v. Rigwald 423 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rigwald v. Rigwald 423 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(citing Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , ) (post-appeal order null and void because the perfecting of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction).
Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 493-94
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
an order entered after an appeal is taken, even if not really late, is of no effect since jurisdiction shifts to [the appellate court] once an appeal is perfected.
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald 406 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald 406 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although this post-appeal order is null and void and of no effect because issued after the notice of appeal was filed in this case, we may take “cognizance of it for the insight it affords.” pet.
Andersen v. Andersen 376 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Andersen v. Andersen 376 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schaub v. Kortgard 372 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schaub v. Kortgard 372 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In general, however, there is no showing of a where one party used threats and intimidating tactics to force a partner to surrender majority control, and later to resign, involving the appropriation of a corporate opportunity.
House v. Baxter 371 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
House v. Baxter 371 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bio-Line Inc. v. Wilfley 365 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bio-Line Inc. v. Wilfley 365 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brzinski v. Frederickson 365 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brzinski v. Frederickson 365 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abendroth v. NAT. FARMERS U. PROP. & CAS. CO. 363 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abendroth v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 363 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abendroth v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 363 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abendroth v. NAT. FARMERS U. PROP. & CAS. CO. 363 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 356 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 356 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
an order entered after an appeal is taken, even if not really late, is of no effect since jurisdiction shifts to this court once an appeal is perfected.
State v. Myhro 354 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Myhro 354 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of C. Children 348 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of C. Children 348 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
4 Am.Jur.2d Appeal & Error, § 352 (1962).