Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sanders, 376 N.W.2d 196.
- State v. Crandall 452 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Fidel 451 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Fidel
451 N.W.2d 350
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
the supreme court again considered a trial court’s instruction pursuant to CRIM.
- State v. Johnson 441 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1989
- State v. Johnson 441 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1989
- State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
State v. Olson
436 N.W.2d 817
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
403; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 40
- State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Hennum
428 N.W.2d 859
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-01 (Minn.1985) (jury instruction on self-defense patterned on CRIM.
- State v. Redding 422 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Redding
422 N.W.2d 260
Minn. 1988
(ii) The argument that the trial court erred in admitting the autopsy photographs is answered by a number of prior decisions
- State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
-
State v. Mitjans
408 N.W.2d 824
Minn. 1987
adequately discusses the need for analytic precision in instructions on self-defense.
- Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Rupp 393 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Rupp 393 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
- State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985