DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. McGee, 347 N.W.2d 802.

73 citing documents.

  • State v. Rasinski 472 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1991
    (“we believe that defendant’s prior convictions of DWI bear on an evaluation of his conduct and render his conduct more serious.”).
  • State v. VanWert 442 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1989
  • State v. VanWert 442 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1989
    See, and State v. Hansen, 296 Minn. 42, 46-47
  • State v. Dahle 428 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dahle 428 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    (ambiguities in the sentencing guidelines “should be resolved against the state and in the defendant’s favor”).
  • State v. Williams 414 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Fett 414 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Fett 414 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    806 n. 1 (Minn.1984) (lack of remorse is relevant to determination of amenability to probation); (perpetrator-related factors such as una-menability to probation bear on dispositional departure); d *785 273 (Minn.1983) (remorse bears on disposi-tional
  • State v. Williams 414 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Nonetheless, where the defendant was apparently extremely drunk, the court has considered prior DWI convictions reasoning that “just as a second DWI conviction is now considered an aggravated violation, * * * [a] defendant’s prior convictions of DWI bear on an evaluation of his conduct and render his conduct more serious.” accord Sentencing Guidelines II.B.3 (does not exclude prior DWI offenses from calculation of criminal history score when current conviction offense is criminal vehicular opera
  • State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Henning 378 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Henning 378 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Schultz 362 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Schultz 362 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Anderson 361 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Anderson 361 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. McGee 357 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1984
  • State v. McGee 357 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1984
    we decided defendant’s separate expedited sentencing appeal, concluding that a remand for resen-tencing was required.
  • State v. Olson 355 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Olson 355 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    (“a defendant’s intoxication alone does not justify a conviction of criminal negligence”).
  • State v. Stephanie 354 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Stephanie 354 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1984