Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Yost v. Millhouse, 373 N.W.2d 826.

31 citing documents.

Anshuman Bhatia, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Out-of-pocket loss “is the difference between the actual value of the property received and the price paid for it.” - 31 (Minn. App. 1985) (-02 ( Minn. 1957)).
Daniel J. Engstrom, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-31 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted).
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In such situations, the omission must be material, see 757 F.2d at 417 , 675 N.E.2d at 595 , meaning it must naturally affect the person’s decision or conduct
Kellogg v. Woods 720 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kellogg v. Woods 720 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(noting that, for purposes of misrepresentation claim, knowledge of falsity is not required and can be satisfied by proof that representer asserted facts of own knowledge without knowing their truth or falsity).
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(finding sufficient evidence of express warranty where seller makes representation about character of merchandise).
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
-32 (Minn.App.1985) (holding individual purchasing two horses was covered by the CFA).
Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1992
In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McCarron's Building Center, Inc. v. Einertson 482 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McCarron's Building Center, Inc. v. Einertson 482 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Church of Nativity of Our Lord v. Watpro, Inc. 474 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Church of Nativity of Our Lord v. Watpro, Inc. 474 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Allison v. Sherburne Country Mobile Home Park 475 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Allison v. Sherburne Country Mobile Home Park 475 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Wexler v. Brothers Entertainment Group, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wexler v. Brothers Entertainment Group, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bank North v. Soule 409 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bank North v. Soule 409 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
O'Brien Entertainment Agency, Inc. v. Wolfgramm 407 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
O'Brien Entertainment Agency, Inc. v. Wolfgramm 407 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“A statement of fact is material if it would naturally affect the conduct of the party addressed.”
Eager v. Siwek Lumber & Millwork, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Eager v. Siwek Lumber & Millwork, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1986