Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rambaum v. Swisher, 435 N.W.2d 19.

37 citing documents.

In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 787 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 787 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In a Pierringer agreement, a tortfeasor settles “for its fair share of plaintiff’s award as later determined by the trier of fact.”
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bunce v. A.P.I., Inc. 696 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bunce v. A.P.I., Inc. 696 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Carlson v. Thompson 615 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Carlson v. Thompson 615 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(stating elements of civil damages act claims, including an illegal sale and the occurrence of a sale violation that “substantially relate(s) to the purposes sought to be achieved by the civil damages act”).
Koehnen v. Dufuor 590 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1999
Koehnen v. Dufuor 590 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1999
Ricke v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 577 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ricke v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 577 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The supreme court addressed a
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
ringer release relieves a settling defendant in a multiple tortfeasor situation from incurring additional liability, -23 (Minn.1978) (citing Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis.2d 182 , ); the remaining defendants in such cases are not entitled to any credit or offset based on the settlement proceeds received by the plaintiff, -23 (Minn.1989) (relying on the intent of the parties, the concern that tortfeasors should pay their fair share, and the law’s policy of encouraging settlements); and, in general,
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Although a non-settling tort-feasor has no right to complain about a Pierringer settlement, as long as it is only required to pay its fair share of the verdict, the non-settling tortfeasor has a definite right to complain if it would be required to pay more than its fair share of the damages.
Kunza v. Pantze 527 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kunza v. Pantze 527 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kellen v. Mathias 519 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See, -23 (Minn.1989) (plaintiff overcompensated where amount paid to settle claim was in excess of jury verdict attributable to the settling defendant).
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Olson v. Blaeser 458 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Olson v. Blaeser 458 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See, -22 (Minn.1989) (listing the types of illegal sales which have subjected vendors to dramshop liability and explaining method for determining whether liability should attach in a particular case).
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990
Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1990