Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zacher, 504 N.W.2d 468.
- State v. Harvey 547 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Harvey 547 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Orsello 529 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Orsello 529 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Hendrickson 528 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Johnson 528 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Johnson 528 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
State v. Hendrickson
528 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(rule of strict construction does not require assigning the narrowest possible interpretation to the statute).
- State v. Shu Dian Peng 524 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Shu Dian Peng
524 N.W.2d 21
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
But this does not require the court to “assign the narrowest possible interpretation to the statute.”
- State v. Parsley 521 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Parsley 521 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994